-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Molle Bestefich wrote: > Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: >> You'd rather fill in a bug report and submit the patch in the bug. >> Not in this list, definitely. > > Oh, ok. Never mind then, I fear I'd be spending way too much time > fighting with Jakub trying to get the ebuild in the tree. I'll just > drop it. > > (Nothing personal, I just don't think it would work out, heh.) Nonsense. Jacub's a big pussy cat who gets stressed out a bit and needs a vacation ;) Does the package your thinking of have a specific category set (for instance, maybe unmaintained specifically, but falls under a broad category that the bug could go to?).
As others have (and will) comment, posting patches on this is flamebait of the worst kind. Hope to see you on bugzie, I know I for one welcome bugs that come with their own patch solutions :) - -- - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEsYFjq1ztTp5/Ti4RAkrvAJ9P0fEqHkyLszQ1w+SB/5NM2iD2VACffyjs 7fPxvNbvDql3O8VyOBkOwJw= =yGyY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
