On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 07:44:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:14, Harald van Dijk wrote: > > Gentoo's gcc with the vanilla flag isn't the official GCC. Most patches > > don't get appplied, but some do. Plus, gcc[vanilla] isn't a supported > > compiler in Gentoo. > > you're just griping because i forced ssp/pie regardless of USE=vanilla ...
I didn't mind that you applied ssp/pie patches regardless of USE=vanilla, I did mind that you applied the stub patches with USE="nossp vanilla", and I also didn't like that this was either done accidentally but ignored when pointed out, or that this was done deliberately with a misleading cvs log message. > since gcc-4.0 and below are on the way out, i have no problem changing this > behavior > > besides, since both of these technologies are in mainline gcc now, i really > dont see how you can continue to gripe with gcc-4.1.1+ I don't know how much gcc-spec-env.patch can be trusted, and even if it is 100% safe, such patches don't belong in anything that would be called "vanilla". (I have commented on that patch long before this thread started, so don't think I'm just looking for something to complain about now.) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
