Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems more fitting to group those packages together. On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:48 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote: > > Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz, > > and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity > > of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting > > that a Virtualization herd be formed to handle these packages. I was > > also going to suggest moving virtualization-related things out of > > app-emulation, since they don't quite fit the bill of "emulation". Maybe > > QEMU, Bochs, and VMWare would fit, but, not quite. These are the > > packages that would be affected: > > > > * Xen/Xen-tools > > * QEMU > > * OpenVZ > > * Bochs > > * VMWare (workstation, server, etc) > > * User-mode Linux > > > > ..and the list goes on... > > the packages related to OS-level virtualization (OpenVZ, Linux-VServer) are > already in the vserver herd > > > > > Just a suggestion :) > > > > ~ Nick
-- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
