Seemant Kulleen wrote: > First of all, I'm not sure why devrel was involved in a technical > decision without actually having all the interested parties there, but > aside from that, when Gentoo developers become a bunch of 5 year olds?
Not sure either, maybe brix will be able to answer your question better. > What is this absolute nonsense of "you don't like my toy, you can't have > your toy" going on around here? Jakub, if you will disrupt others > because you can't have your way, then please reconsider exactly what > your role is in this project, and maybe even how you might better serve > some other project. Uhm, what I am saying here is that we can either have a *general* policy on acceptable bugzilla usage, or no policy at all. Inventing ad-hoc policies for a single project just because a couple of folks dislike that project does not do any good and does not make any sense either. The whole concept of status whiteboard and keywords usage constituting a misuse of Gentoo infrastructure is pretty new to me. That stuff is there to make searching for bugs and their grouping easier, and as such has been used. Then someone comes to #-devrel with the above complaint, and devrel (or some its member) within an hour decides that all such keywords and status whiteboard records need to be nuked from bugzilla? What are the grounds for such decision, and why it's OK for one unofficial project to use bugzilla for their bugs, and why it's so horribly wrong for another unofficial project to even pollute those fields, without actually creating new bugs? That's what this thread is about, and that's why I have brought this up. Not to harm java migration and java folks. As I have stated already, I have no problem with their bugs, I've even talked to nichoj some weeks ago to arrange it in the best possible way. > This childishness from *all* sides is getting really old, really fast. > People need to grow the hell up, and quit with the melodrama. > > Seemant There would not be any issue if devrel didn't act the way they did, the matter has not been urgent at all. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
