On Friday 16 June 2006 20:10, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > The reason for describing this is to illustrate that qemu is not > "broken" as such; it just relies on implementation detail of the pre-4 > gcc series.
then it's broken by design ... sure the idea about how qemu goes about its emulation is pretty goddamn cool, but gcc has never said that you can rely on certain behavior -mike
pgpm7mEj14C7x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
