On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 22:34 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > It's not irrelevant; you're just not reading it properly. You might
> > notice that metadata.xml contains tags other than <herd>, like, say,
> > <maintainer>. In the example that sparked this, <herd> is games and
> > <maintainer> the individual dev who maintains it. Simple enough, no?
> 
> Please, go through the tree and see at least so many metadata.xml files
> as I have seen, before claiming something that simply doesn't reflect
> current practice. There are many ebuilds with no <maintainer> tag and
> <herd> only. Are you claiming that they are unmaintained? Well, that

Nobody said that they were unmaintained.  Again, why do people *insist*
on trying bullshit arguments like this?  "Are you claiming.."  No, he's
not claiming that, or he would have *said* that.

> obviously doesn't match the reality. So, if they actually _are_
> maintained by the relevant herd, then you shouldn't dump stuff on that
> herd without discussing it w/ them first. I'm pretty sure mcummings will
> gladly explain to you what will happen if you do, as well as a bunch of
> other devs... :P

A herd is a group of packages, not a listing of people.  When you get
information from the herds.xml, you are getting the listing of the
people that *maintain* that herd.  You are not getting a listing of the
people *in* the herd.

Please go back and read the herds project page[1] and try to understand
this.  It really is printed quite simply.


> To make it pretty clear and explicit - bugs gets assigned to
> <maintainer> (if there's any in metadata.xml), and get CCed to <herd>
> (if there's any in metadata.xml). If there's no <maintainer>, whoever is
> in <herd> will get that bug assigned and can happily smack you butt once
> they've find out you've dumped the package on them without their
> knowledge... That's how the large part of current ~600 dev-perl/*
> ebuilds has made it into the tree and that mistake doesn't need to be
> repeated.

You are correct.  This is *exactly* how it works.  Also, you'll notice
that nothing either I or Stephen has said contradicts this, if you
actually went back and contemplated what we both said.

[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to