On Friday 02 June 2006 00:33, Mark Loeser wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > > Gentoo dev list to see. > > As I requested in an earlier email, I would like it to be discussed how > we want to handle alternative package managers. The GLEPs both touch on > the issue, but if neither of those proposals are liked, then we are > still left not knowing what to do. > > Here is my original email: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38231 > > As I said in my email, I want there to be a discussion (and hopefully a > decision) as to whether or not adding these packages to *our* tree is > best for us and our users. In my opinion, it seems to make the most > sense for alternative package managers to be hosted on their own > infrastructure so they are free to introduce new features and write > ebuilds to take advantage of those features. > > If it is required for me to be present at the meeting to discuss this (I > don't believe I have to be), then could whoever does the scheduling get > in touch with me, because it will be difficult for me to be here during > the day since I just started a new job.
I support this request, and in return am willing to incorporate suggestions by the council into my GLEP. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp1OzUoiuaFd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
