On Wednesday 17 May 2006 19:38, Thomas Cort wrote: > Isn't discussing if paludis can build ISOs for a bunch of arches a > level of indirection? This thread was originally about adding a > profile. The profile doesn't affect anyone who doesn't use it, nor does > it require any changes to existing ebuilds or profiles. It adds no work > for developers who are not interested. The only additional work load > would be to bug wranglers for users who file bugs, and this has already > been discussed. Can we please get back on topic. Is there a valid > technical reason against adding the profile?
The profile is a step in the process of paludis becomming accepted. Besides a profile being unneeded at this point, it is also to early to provide this level of support to an alternative package maanger. If the profile is accepted at this point, it also means that gentoo has accepted paludis in some way. This is a bigger way than just having it in the tree. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgphcMRUdlnEX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
