On Wed, 17 May 2006 07:03:27 +0200 Christian Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Please try to come up with something sliiightly more plausible than | > that when you're trying to attack something based upon your personal | > prejudices. Or is that really the best criticism you can find? | | Uh yeah. It's all just based on my personal prejudices. - Why did I | give paludis a try (on several VMs) then first? Remember when paludis | was segfaulting?
Sure. You ran -svn (our release check procedures would have caught that before it hit a release anyway), found a bug, and it got fixed and a testcase was added to ensure that the same kind of issue didn't reoccur. Did you want a cookie or something? | That's how you want to understand it. It's easy to pervert the facts | if one just constantly writes the same FUD over and over again. But | this doesn't change anything. People will become tired to discuss the | profile changes. Then the profile will be added. - You win. - Hooray. | | It has always been that way. - Changes won't be made because they are | sensible. They will be made because people are sick off wasting their | time on discussions like that. - So am I. If you'd like far less time wasted on discussions, perhaps you and your co-offenders should try not posting huge numbers of emails that are free of technical objections. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
