On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:40:18 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a problem about both of them being there? You can't use both on the same ROOT. The VDB format is subtly different. > I don't see a problem in changing the profiles to include > virtual/portage though where portage is the default provider. It is a > change unrelated to paludis, and would allow easier development of > any alternative package manager. This could be a viable alternative if the paludis profile is shown to be a no-go. A seperate profile would make things easier from a bug-wrangling point of view, since it would be easier to determine when a bug may be caused by using paludis. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
