On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:14:53 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should not be a side note IMHO. If that profile is in the tree, > who in Gentoo will support it? I will. > Does the Gentoo Project not support the > entire tree all of a sudden? There are plenty of ebuilds in the tree marked as unsupported by gentoo. Probably some profiles too, though I can't name them for certain off the top of my head. > 1) Is bugsy ready for this, with appropriate categories in place? Paludis-related bugs can be marked as invalid and the user directed to Paludis' bug tracker on berlios.de. Alternatively, if our friendly Bugzilla admins want to create categories I won't complain. I don't see a need for it though. > 2) Is there an alias addy for Paludis related issues, so that Paludis > users can communicate with members of some Paludis profile team for > support? For issues related to Gentoo packaging of paludis, bugs can be filed to the ebuild maintainer listed in metadata.xml. For other paludis-related issues, there are mailing lists mentioned on the web site. > 3) Is documentation support in place to refer Paludis profile users to > when they fail to understand "reason" and demand Gentoo support for > issues with the Paludis profile? http://paludis.berlios.de/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
