On Tue, 16 May 2006 22:09:10 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: | > ++ for Halcy0n, and adding from an ebuild maintainer some more, | > many parts of the current tree are at a minimum understaffed, if | > we're going to have to start dealing with bugs coming from users | > experimenting with something else but portage, we'd be _really_ | > taken over. | | I didn't say "big", I didn't say "change", I didn't even refer to the | profile itself. I agreed with Halcy0n's post and I said that dealing | with bugs that might be coming out of portage's misbehaviours being | depended on might make us get taken over by bugs.
Perhaps you should've read Halcy0n's post: > I don't think we should start making changes to the tree for another > package manager, pkgcore or paludis. Looks like you were agreeing with a "change" argument to me. | So I didn't appeal to any "big change" argument, and you're still | missing your point. Ooh, so it's a "small change" argument? That's even more hypocritical. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
