On Friday 05 May 2006 15:23, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> I disagree.  Your argument is for not using ~arch at all, rather
> than an argument against keeping control of what you have from ~arch.

No. My argument is that category/ebuild is much better than 
=category/ebuild-x*. If and only if there's a problem with the former, you 
should take the latter into account and monitor the ebuild changes closely.

> In practice, I tend to do:
>
> =category/package-version* ~arch
>
> so that I pick up -rN bumps on unstable versions as this should mean
> that the maintainer considers the change necessary for users of that
> version.

So you won't get security updates, when this means it is a version bump. And 
this is most often the case. Unless you _always_ read the ChangeLogs and 
referenced bugs of all ebuilds you run testing, this is not safe.


Carsten

Attachment: pgpjltTGPFPD2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to