060505 Jakub Moc wrote: > Philip Webb wrote: >> 060504 Chris Gianelloni wrote: >>> If we followed others blindly, as so many users suggest, >>> then we would have stabilized KDE 3.5 ages ago, >>> and every single one of you KDE users would be complaining >>> about how our QA sucks because KDE doesn't compile >>> or breaks badly in so many places. >> This is rubbish: I'm now using 3.5.2 & have had no problems whatsoever; >> nor did I have problems earlier with 3.5.0 & 3.5.1 . > Oh, sure it's complete rubbish... > there are only ~40 bugs open right now about KDE 3.5 > (on a quick and definitely incomplete search). > The fixed/upstream ones would definitely be well over 100, > don't have any good query for that.
Well, if you're going to wait for all bugs with all KDE packages on all platforms to be fixed, you'll never stabilise any new KDE version. It's time developers started thinking a bit more like users: which version of KDE do you use everyday ? > http://tinyurl.com/rg55l 122121 x86-64 ; 121270 "can't reproduce" (twice); 114860 kmail (I don't use Kmail, which is 1 modular package). I don't have time to go through them all, but that's the 1st 3 I picked. These are not reasons to keep the majority of KDE packages in ~x86 . > But yeah, you know better, no problems whatsoever. :P Yes, I know better: I haven't had any problems with any of the KDE packages which I have installed with versions 3.5.0 3.5.1 3.5.2 . It's time the developers started listening to users in this area: we really do appreciate your volunteer work, but without users that work would all be pointless. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
