-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 lo,
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 19:51, Grant Goodyear wrote: > I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP > help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is > rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing > request. Since then I believe that lcars had taken LDAP over nope, lcars is not on the ldap team, though he was doing some dox. > , or is > otherwise assisting robbat2 (or the LDAP team, if we have one now). In > any event, I doubt that I'm the only irresponsible dev who's added an > entry to the staffing-needs page and forgot about it, so perhaps we > need to have items expire unless explicitly renewed? Thoughts? I'd say ldap is fine right now. I think we've got most of the big issues out of the way and I'm happy to update whatever documentation people think needs updating if someone would point me at the current versions. > PS. Does anybody know if we do still need people to help w/ LDAP? I'd say we're fine now. - -- Benjamin Smee (strerror) crypto/forensics/netmail/netmon/ldap -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.20 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEWcdHAEpm7USL54wRAoqvAJ9SHNacD3bT1FRp0jErr9f3pPNaoQCdG57P 14y2Cq0wQf+QX3qunz0DqjQ= =QEWk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
