On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > dont know what policy you're referring to seeing as how we dont have any > concerning unmaintained packages
Still hiding... c'mon you are better than this. > sure, for new packages ... cccc isnt a new package The policy concerning metadata makes no difference between new/(un)maintained. It just says that every package should have one. So if you come across a pack that doesn't and you touch it, you need to fix that. - foser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
