Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:39:28PM -0600, R Hill wrote: >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> R Hill wrote: >>>> There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just >>>> as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to >>>> hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. >>>> (course someone will undoubtedly point one out now ;)) >>> How about kde? >> Close, that's -fvisibility=hidden. :) >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#visibility >> >> --de. > > kdevelop used to not compile with -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, not sure > if that's changed now.
Sure enough it's changed - kde.eclass now filters all this visibility crap (-fvisibility=hidden *and* -fvisibility-inlines-hidden) by default because it bombs out really badly... :) http://groups.google.de/group/linux.gentoo.dev/browse_frm/thread/f43fac917352bb51/5093e84871f08de6?lnk=st More fun: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109386 http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2005/11/16/happy_the_visibility_stuff_goes_away http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2005/10/06/ehi_i_m_invisible -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
