On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:44, Jon Portnoy wrote: > Well, quite frankly devrel has never fallen down on the job quite so > often & so hard before handling this particular incident. I don't think > it's so unreasonable to have backup plans for preserving Gentoo when > devrel cannot respond in a timely manner
If you exclude that devrel for a long long while was unable to retire developers properly and if you exclude that people bitched about devrel not updating docs - then maybe. I'm stating this, please don't take it as flaming. Carsten
pgphPKubxwRHS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
