On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:42:50 -0300 "Marcelo Góes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/2/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not the case. At least unless the user actively looks at > > package.mask. Since Portage doesn't provide the information, this point is > > void. And even if - four weeks are a too long, imho. > > I still do not understand what the rush is with removing a package. > Readding a package if necessary will be much more troublesome than > just keeping it masked for a month. I believe this is the general > consensus on the subject. > +1 on this one. Give people (and developers) time, not everybody is lightning's younger brother like you seem to be. Contrary to popular belief, there actually *are* people who sync less often than once per week. It's not like package.mask-ed package hurts anyone. I can't see what's the rush here either. Kind regards, -- Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org> Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
