On 2025-09-16 20:37:39, Michał Górny wrote: > > I don't think the number of users alone is a key issue here. The real > question is, do these users actually perform a humongous number of > small-dimension computations where such an overhead will actually > matter?
Ultimately I don't think it will *matter* to anyone. But ironically, the type of person it will bother most is the sort who wants to switch his BLAS implementation. It's worth it to fix the other issues you pointed out. From what I can tell, your approach can even be extended in the future with other system-blas providers if anyone cares enough to do it.
