On Sunday 02 April 2006 15:12, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Sunday 02 April 2006 20:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > nothing personal, but who are you to say whether it's legit ? > > It's really not a question what's legit (heck, you started using this term, > so blaming Olivier for using it is a bit odd)
i didnt blame Olivier for anything ... doesnt anyone get the "nothing personal" part ? > but what we (can and want to) support. i dont recall asking you to support my packages > Wouldn't it have been time for you to speak up, when the Gnome > herd announced to deprecate Gtk1 support for applications that build again > Gtk2!? Instead playing the road block for the very few people who may still > favor Gtk1, last time i recall following the gtk/gtk2 stuff, the idea was that in the future to move to a gtk/gtk1 situation ... but this was back when Spider was The Man, so i guess people forgot about that > it should be more the question, if there's anyone supporting > Gtk1 upstream with regards to security issues etc.. and when such a situation arises, the solution may to simply drop the optional support. such a situation has not arose, so using such hypothetical examples is meaningless. -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
