>>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024, Michał Górny wrote: >> IMHO this would abuse the package name for information that absolutely >> doesn't belong there. It belongs in PV or SLOT. >> >> To me it seems that you try to work around a problem (greedy upgrade >> behaviour) that should really be solved in the package manager.
> In my opinion, it's the other way around. We have slots, that are a fit > solution for packages that are roughly compatible between every major > release, and we keep abusing them for every single thing we can bend > enough to make it fit. So are you saying that Python versions aren't "roughly compatible" between releases? Like, they're a completely different language? Also, we're not talking about major releases here (that would have been Python 2 vs 3).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
