On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 20:30 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be > resolved, moving packages around should be avoided.
It's a shame we can't find a way to turn package categories into solely a presentational feature, rather than being an integral part of the package's identity as it is today. (And, at the same time, multi-depth categories would also be nice :) With the way things are today, "improvements" to the structure of the package tree are held back by our historical legacy. As the tree grows, it makes sense to move packages into new groups that weren't viable before - and to clear out historical dumping grounds in the process. If package categories were only something that users used to find things - and weren't used by Portage as part of a package's unique identity - then we could afford to be more flexible on this. Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://blog.stuartherbert.com/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
