On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please > give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable > with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump > request. If I take over a week (or whatever), then maybe I need > reminding, so let me know! OTOH, if the bug includes "I tried bumping the > last ebuild to use the new sources and it worked fine", or "... and it > broke at <whatever>", that's far more valuable than just a bump request, > and I'd treat it so. (In fact, that sounds like possible AT/HT material, > maybe ultimately leading to a new dev, to me.)
bingo. a bug for bumping because their edges aren't bloody enough, bah, it'll get done just as soon as i can, but not before then, probably in the next week or so. now a version bump bug because it fixes an actual BUG, ping me, that i'll avoid coffee breaks (actually...that's not a good thing to do...) and sleep to get it in and working. I'm with this Duncan on this one (and someone said the way i couldn't manage in my other drafts :) ~mcummings
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
