On Sunday 15 January 2006 19:54, George Shapovalov wrote: > Ok, I got the answer from upstream and, as I expected, 2005 refers to the > language specification and is not a release version. Upstream in fact is > undecided at this point on what naming/versioning scheme it is going to > use, so we need to come up with something.. Then 3.4.5.1 seems as good to > me as 2005, probably even better (than the latter) since it is more > descriptive (and is in fact easier to follow technically).
Alternatively, if you use something low like 0.0_pre20050124, the upgrade path to whatever version name is chosen is easy and uncumbersome. Of course don't do this if it's likely to be years for a proper version to be chosen. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpT5nPWFwCm2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
