On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 21:25 -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote: > My point is that this isn't like the libstdc++ situation. > wasn't implying it was - different thread, different thought :)
> Many people have things dependent on Perl, but my impression is not that > things would break, but rather that Perl would adhere to the rules of > any other dynamically linked library, including breakage from certain > upgrades. heh - that would imply that when you currently upgrade perl's, there's no breakage, which isn't true since libperl isn't slotted, so your old libperl's are getting wiped anyway. like i said in the original message, looking for opinions - this wasn't something i was ready to commit or anything :) ~mcummings
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
