On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:39:38PM -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Harald van Dijk posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below,  on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:42 +0100:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're 
> >> looking to cut out use.defaults support
> > 
> > Could you add a USE_ORDER without "auto" to /etc/make.globals for that
> > release, please, or alternatively provide some other way of checking
> > whether use.defaults is read? This would greatly help me out with ufed,
> > which currently has no way to check this, and instead has to hardcode
> > "env:pkg:conf:auto:defaults" as the default USE_ORDER just like portage
> > does.
> 
> According to previous posts, USE_ORDER will be going away with
> use.defaults, because that was really the only reason it was there in the
> first place as there's no other sane ordering possible, if it is removed.

There are other sane orderings possible, one being pkg:env:conf:defaults
so that USE=xxx emerge -NpDuv world will show exactly what adding xxx to
make.conf will do. I don't recall where I saw this, unfortunately, but I
do know that some people actually use it for this. (Okay, maybe that's
really the only other sane ordering.)

Attachment: pgpMg6wyFCtLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to