Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
(fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
lu
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
[2] http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=fenice
Hi all,
not a dev, but please bear with me :-)
From [1] above:
GLEP: 20
Title: /srv - Services Home Directory Support
Version: 1.2
Last-Modified: 2004/11/11 21:35:53
Author: Stuart Herbert <stuart at gentoo.org>, Rob Holland <tigger at
gentoo.org>
Status: Approved
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 09-Feb-2004
Post-History: 21-Feb-2004, 11-Nov-2004
It is 2006, any updates on this GELP?
Just a quick look turned out a 404 error on the FHS2.3 link. (
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ?)
I am not very read in LSB, but just saw there is a 3.x version...
What about LSB 3.x? Is it the same recomendation?
Although I run quite a bunch of services on a few boxes, I don't see this whole
idea (/srv).
I read the GLEP, I read [FHS#srv] but still. And it says:
"The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified
as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done."
So how does Gentoo implement it?
[FHS#svg]
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
And as the GLEP talks about webapps, what will an upgrade of a webapp (say
Bugzilla) to/from srv?
I feel it breaking and user screaming.
that's an useflag you may use it or not, webapps use webapp-config that
already handles /srv w/out any problem, having the base webroot using
srvdir would be nice so you spare a couple of mv but that's all...
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
