On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:15:22AM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Sunday 01 January 2006 06:30, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Keep in mind that every resubmission to the council for review must > > first be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list 7 days (minimum) before > > being submitted as an agenda item which itself occurs 7 days before the > > meeting. Simply put, the gentoo-dev mailing list must be notified at > > least 14 days before the meeting itself. > > I think I'm too late for this month, but want to put it on the table before I > forget about it. I'd appreciate a three months moratorium, disallowing > everyone to add new packages to the tree (despite new dependencies of > existing packages), so everyone is forced/asked to put his energy in existing > ebuilds, especially unmaintained ones. Sort of spring-cleaning, because parts > of the tree look like a dump.
-1 Asking people to focus on cleaning the tree? Sure. Generate a list of candidates would help. Blocking new packages? No... ~harring
pgpz6nfs2cWpa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
