On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:27:23AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 02:36 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > 
> >>OTOH, it's entirely possible a Gentoo /based/ enterprise distribution may
> >>emerge at some point.  IMO, however, there's enough conflict with what
> >>makes Gentoo great at what it does today, that such efforts should be
> >>separate from Gentoo itself.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't disagree with you entirely, but there's nothing stopping us from
> > *also* producing a "Gentoo Enterprise Linux" distribution.
> > 
> > Like I said, I'll post my proposal, modified to fit the times, of
> > course, as soon as I get a chance (it'll take a while to write back up).
> 
> As seen from the discussion earlier this week, I don't think Gentoo has
> the proper open-mindness to create a proper enterprise distro.

Why should gentoo do it?  While this statement likely will be twisted 
around as "gentoo developers don't want enterprise", what I'm asking 
specifically is why pulling and maintaining a subset of ebuilds is 
something that must exist within gentoo.  We *do* have projects 
external to gentoo.

Either way, 'open-mindness' bit is off- I'm mentioning this 
alternative due to the fact that it's not a matter of 'open-mindness', 
matter of interest.  Can't make folk do what they don't give a damn 
about.

> Just look at all the comments made from my thread earlier. 
> You cannot make an enterprise distro without
> focus or direction and a leader. You'll be stuck in committee decisions
> all the time.

If y'all spawn an enterprise distro of gentoo you can run it however 
you want.  Sub project or external, your stuff, your decisions- 
reaction was to y'all pushing that management structure upon gentoo as 
a whole, rather then the folk who desire it.

Meanwhile, either we can discuss glep19 specifics, or continue working 
over an issue that bluntly doesn't matter right now- management 
structure matters not if y'all don't have the basic technical reqs 
nailed down.

So can we stick tech crap at this point please?

~harring

Attachment: pgp8bRh00TqAl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to