On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > There are some interesting ideas on the Gentoo Forums that aren't situated > in any of the current projects, such as "Top-100 Feature Requests" [1], > "Gentoo > Binary profile" [2], "Gentoo Knowledge Base" [3], "USE-flag triggered > software installation" [4], etc. [...]
(Sorry, pressed "send" too soon).
However, having such proposals is great, but they need to be worked out by
one or more users and formed into a GLEP. Such GLEPs can then be discussed
on the mailinglist and sent for "approval" to the Gentoo Council.
Now this is where the Gentoo Council comes in: its role is to /advise/
Gentoo's development, not regulate. If GLEPs come occasionally, there is
barely any reason not to positively advise to implement GLEP. After all, if
there are issues with it they would either be broken down during the
mailinglist discussions, or they are broken down when the teams themselves
refuse to implement them.
When several GLEPs require (immediate) attention, the Council will try to
advise where the priorities should be placed (which GLEP goes first).
When several GLEPs interfere with each other, the Council will try to advise
which GLEP is most beneficial for Gentoo and its community.
Some people hope to see the Council as a regulating body. Forget it,
developers are the brains that lead Gentoo's evolution, voluntary work is the
blood that keeps Gentoo rolling, the community is the heart for which
we all work. As such, there is no single regulating body.
And as much as I hope to see a select few bring bright ideas, coördinate
projects and make everyone's work easier, I have seen too many attempts that
kill bright ideas to know far from everyone would be happy with such a
situation.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
Gentoo Council Member
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>
pgpcsHpspmPGL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
