-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: | Mike Frysinger wrote: | | |>If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |>vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |>Gentoo dev list to see. | | | Gentoo has been missing some kind of direction/goal for some time now. | Looking back at the last two years, what are the major | changes/accomplishments that we have done? Granted, I know there has | been great strides in improvement in some things, but I really wonder | about any ground breaking enhancements. | | Since the council is the closest representation to a leader we have, I'd | like to ask if they can come up with some kind of global goals for 2006 | and beyond. You don't need to come up with goals by this meeting if you | haven't had time, but at least by the February meeting. Each group can | have their own goals, but we lack any overall binding goals or | direction. We've brought on numerous devs in the past year, and I have | yet to see a huge improvement in QA or anything else. Numbers aren't | everything. If anything, it makes it harder to maintain good QA.
Why don't we start at a smaller level and see where we get? In other words, we can build the big picture goals from where our projects and subprojects are going. Now that projects can be freely created, I see no reason that any herd or any developer in Gentoo cannot be part of a project. Each project could come up with its goals and directions, and we could see how (or whether) they fit together. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDug0zXVaO67S1rtsRAmUJAJsHZs+tP0ERWd2Y/TpxPLvCAVWuugCfXCyC G3ppfRUH0AcSNyqUnFs8c/Q= =400/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
