On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:52 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > >>I just picked some package as an example of the output with > >>openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those > >>libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies > >>don't say to pull in required libraries. This just means that apr-util > >>should be fixed. > >> > > > > > > By the way, you might want to check the locations of libraries. > > Openoffice-bin > > does not satisfy the dependency for the db library. It namely is outside > > the > > library search path (and it should be). You might want to use ld.so.conf > > with > > the rpath attribute of the binary to determine which libraries to consider. > > > > Working on it with solar. I just put the || in there until I have > something better. Thinking about libstdc++-v3 having all the > alternatives is also useful. Developers should know that the one from > openoffice is not used.
We just added -L to be used with -n in scanelf(pax-utils-0.1.6) to search the ld.so.cache. It works in uclibc and glibc environments and handles 32/64 bit dupes. We can't verify any of the *BSD's at this time however as we no access to one of it's caches. -- solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
