Peter wrote: > Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this > concept are devs, and the only people for it are users.
Please see Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (for those using MUAs that suck, it's "Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:16:53 -0600", "From: Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" in this thread). > If you are against meta ebuilds, what is your opinion on KDE? Instead on 9 > (or so) packages, there are now over 250! Are 250 separate ebuilds better? > I cannot think of another distro that slices up KDE that way. Meta > ebuilds at least allow the user the ability to opt out of trying to > decide which ebuilds to emerge! You seem to be confused by split ebuilds and meta ebuilds. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
