On Saturday 10 December 2005 18:13, Lance Albertson wrote: > I think we'll be able to work out the anonymous CVS access soon, however > it will not be implemented as stated in the GLEP.
exact spec in the GLEP was more of an idea ... anon cvs is available -> OK > On the other point, infra has serious issues trying to manage a > subdomain for email addresses. This part of the GLEP we cannot > implement and we ask the GLEP authors to come up with a better solution. > Either we give them an alias that recruiters can manage, or we don't do > anything. The logistical headache of managing moving people around is > too much of a hassle for us to deal with. i would still vote for the subdomain e-mail addresses > Of course, all of these points would have made it into the GLEP *if* it > had been posted with plenty of time for people to comment on it instead > of one day. harping on this old point solves nothing. we've already established quite clearly that this will not happen again in the future. -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
