On Thursday 24 November 2005 06:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge > > > > discussion will be held on this. It's not important in this stage > > > > of the development though... > > > > > > And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's > > > too late to change things? Riiiiiiight. > > > > Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees > > have had a discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we > > need a "strong, compelling case for not using it since it is > > something the community has voted on". > > by 'voted on' you mean the vote that happened on the forums ? i > thought that vote was for the different website designs, they didnt > really cover aspects of different designs
That's true. What I remember from the trustee decision making process was that indeed the winning design was a guideline for what should be implemented, not an absolute. That's why (at least) I wanted Aaron to participate in the implementation. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpk3SlyCqYbm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
