The Specs giving were for the new dev box, not the projected CVS/SVN box. I think the wire got crossed somewhere along the way. -Lares On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 06:31 +0100, Lars Weiler wrote: > * Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/11/19 22:50 -0600]: > > Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make > > sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements. > > I believe the main thing they wanted was lots of ram. > > CVS/SVN doesn't need much CPU load or even several CPUs and > also we don't need a lot of disk-space. But our setup could > make use of a lot of fast RAM and a nice RAID (which we > don't have at the moment). > > So specs are: > - ~3GHz Xeon > - 4-6GB of RAM > - RAID-5 or -10 with u320 disks (for the actual data, 20GB > would be enough for the next years) > - a very good network-connection > > Regards, Lars > -- Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Prefered Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
