Corey Shields wrote: >>Before deciding on such proposals, it might be also wise to consult infra >>people who'll have to implement and maintain such things, IMHO. And, how >>exactly will be people having multiple roles handled here - still missing a >>clear answer... > > Jakub++ Nobody in infra is on board with this idea, so you will be hard > pressed to find someone willing to implement it.
What I find disturbing here is that nobody found the issue interesting enough to read the October Council decisions as to what was needed to be changed for the GLEP to be approved. But when, one month later, those requirements have been met and the GLEP approved, lots of people discover that the issue is interesting and complain about it (when it's a little too late to be changed). I'm losing faith in Gentoo. When the GLEP was first discussed, the general mood was that we shouldn't give ATs the same powers than we give to devs (in particular, no right to vote for the Council), and in consequence a need to tell them apart. The Council rejected the proposed GLEP in that sense. Now, the mood is like the Council want to yellowstar some part of our contributors... and the discussion happen on the same list. You can't just ignore the discussion and the iterim decisions and complain afterwards when the decision is taken. -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
