Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:13:51 -0400 "Luis F. Araujo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Let's write a GLEP to clarify that @g.o addresses is for people who > | cooperates (in a direct way) with Gentoo. > > Don't forget the "... and make a reasonable commitment for a > substantial period of time". In other words, not ATs, who are ATs > because they lack the experience or commitment to be fully fledged > developers. > > Far easier to withdraw the GLEP and just ask for anon cvs access for > people who need it...
I'm actually hoping to get part of our version control repos in an anonymous access setup in the next few months. I'm not entirely sure how we'd implement it and what tree's we'd include and not include, but I am hoping to get something going soon. The only question I ask is if a 30 minute syncing of the repos sufficient for folks? (But perhaps this is a topic better discussed later down the road, mainly curious about other folks thoughts). -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
