On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 19:03 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:55:40 +0100 Xavier Neys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Simon Stelling wrote: > | > Reading gentoo-announce should be mandatory. If a user breaks his > | > system because he didn't know about an important fact due to his > | > lazyness, that's not our problem. Of course they will still bitch, > | > so let's introduce RESOLVED RTF_ML_. > | > | Number of users subscribed to gentoo-announce: 7,988 > | Total number of GETs on our home page and news feed in a *single > | day*: 75,302 from 19,240 different IPs (on Sunday 2005-10-30). > > Probably because gentoo-announce is almost exclusively GLSA spam...
This tends to be my thinking on it. If we were to put in the docs that all important announcements were announced proactively on #1. www.gentoo.org and #2. gentoo-announce, then more users would use them. This has no bearing on --news, which I also think is a good idea and something we should implement. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
