Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:36:18 -0400 Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | I'm sending this email because I have seen some packages marked stable > | on x86 without the permission of the x86 team, and would like the > | people who can mark stable for x86 to contact us. > > Would the x86 team prefer it if lots of people made arrangements of > this kind, or would they rather handle the majority of keywording > themselves? I'd imagine there are quite a few of developers who have > the hardware to do x86 testing, but who would not want to step on the > x86 team's toes... >
For the time being, I believe we would like to make arrangements with a lot of people, instead of being in the dark about who is doing what. This way we could atleast easily know what is probably being neglected by us. I only conferred with a few other people in #gentoo-x86. If anyone else on the x86 team has opinions about this, I'd love to hear them, but as the GLEP is outlined, I believe this way is the best way to go about it. Mark
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
