Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Well, if it's in ~arch it's a candidate to go to stable after further testing. If a package maintainer isn't prepared to have a package moved to stable, they shouldn't take it out of package.mask.
The 30 days are just a rule, there are enough packages which surely need a longer testing period, even if they work flawlessly. Or would you mark gcc 4.0 stable after 30 days? I think that's what Paul wanted to say.
-- Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
