On Tuesday 13 September 2005 04:43 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this side note is unrelated to the point being made and really belongs in > > the previous discussions on the devrel list > > > > besides, is this a bad thing ? i'd prefer to have devs settle crap > > themselves than ever contacting devrel :P > > It's very relevant, because it supports the idea of QA taking care of > technical issues on its own. QA can work faster since it's less objected > do and doesn't need endless committees and documentation -- the > documentation is the broken code.
QA team does not care at all about inner workings of devrel QA team identifies a misbehaving dev who refuses to change and then hands off the name/relevant data to devrel ... QA team then is pretty much done with the issue and the rest is up to devrel to resolve -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
