On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:08 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > 13.9.2005, 13:39:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > I know that this is automatically generated, but can we either change > > the bug subjects or figure out some way to add proposed categories to > > these? I think changing the summary should suffice. For the ones with > > categories, I can pretty much figure out what they are. For the ones > > without, I have no clue and have to look at the bug to determine if I > > would even be interested in it. > > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd have to > change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even remotely sure into > which category would the particular ebuild fit).
Try asking the submitter? *grin* Here's a good example. If I submitted an ebuild for "nwn" what would you think it might be? What if I submitted it as "games-rpg/nwn" instead? Now, a category isn't *required* of there's a decent description (such as the "gkrellm plugin" description shown as an example). The point being that nobody is going to be able to determine what some of these packages are without some serious investigation, as they tend to have cryptic names. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
