On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:35:31 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Chris Gianelloni wrote: | > You'd have a really long list of maintenance architectures for me. | > Like I said, I don't use a single machine. The idea of *any* | > architecture being my "primary" one just doesn't really fit. | > There's also the simple fact that it doesn't matter *at all* what | > the maintainer runs it on, only whether or not (s)he considers it | > stable. | | There have been many cases where I've considered a package stable on | one architecture but not on another. How would I indicate this?
This would be one of the cases where a maintainer / stable keyword would be inappropriate. I suspect there are a lot more of these than some people think... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpkKojUksGWx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
