On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:11:03 +0100 Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Depends on how many refuse I guess ;-) There doesn't seem to be much | sign of any opposition to the concept so far.
Yeah, foser's on holiday. Good time to push the GLEP through. | We have an elected council now; if the council approves the plan, and | devs refuse to follow it, the devs should resign or be ejected. | Otherwise, what's the point? :) Good. Does this mean I can start pushing for UTF-8 again? | I'd be more worried about the impact on users. From a user's point of | view, x86 is a fast-moving arch, where you can normally find an up to | date package, and where most of the major packages are actively and | well maintained by the package maintainers. The introduction of the | x86 arch team will, at some point, turn the x86 arch team into a | bottleneck (just like all the other arch teams already are) The only reason certain arch teams are considered a bottleneck is because they do real testing. As opposed to x86 or ppc, where packages which won't even unpack get marked stable... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpTgoMvPF9ZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
