On Sunday 04 September 2005 15:11, Philip Webb wrote: > Having gone over to Udev, I went to unmerge Devfs & got a big red warning. > It appears that the 2005.1 profile gives Devfs as a virtual: > is this an oversight or is there a reason behind it ? > I would have assumed that Udev would now be the required device manager.
You installed using an earlier profile, obviously, when devfs was the default for virtual/dev-manager (otherwise you wouldn't have it installed). Because the profile depends on a virtual any attempt to remove a package providing that virtual will throw up the warning. Exactly the same symptom you're seeing with editors on -user. -- Mike Williams -- [email protected] mailing list
