On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:24 -0500, Brian Harring wrote: > Aside from that, the parent implementation could stand a tweak or two. > Further, assuming metapkg goes through, virtual is obsoleted. The > inclusion of GRP_STAGE23_USE also bugs me a bit; yes it works right > now, but what happens when you need to push more info in? Seems like > it should be contained on it's own.
Actually, we've dumped GRP_STAGE23_USE in catalyst and decided that it was better to keep everything consistent across the board and just include everything in USE and use it instead. You won't see GRP_STAGE23_USE in any new profiles. > Either way, just a couple of things off the top of my head. My main > push for it is cleanup for stand alone repositories, and ensuring > anything people attempt with profiles doesn't have side effects on the > raw repositories metadata. Ahh... so nothing really crazy or divergent from what we have now, just generally making them cleaner and more sane. I'm definitely behind that 100%. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
