On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 17:51 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > I still think a autoreconf is usually enough, except for cases where > > that do not work, > > And what is "not work" in this case? > - fails with an error so it's impossible to miss as a dev, or > - fails to do things properly, causing subtle bugs that users will run into >
Some guy doing a half ass job on writing configure.{ac,in}, Makefile.am
and whatever other helper scripts causing either autoreconf to fail, or
errors during building.
Don't ask for an example .. I cannot recall now, but I have run into a
few packages in the past.
--
Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
