mine ended up spitting out large amounts of gibberish.... and ruining the readability of the terminal... why would it be so different?
On 8/22/05, Tavis Ormandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 00:21:16 +0000 Renat Lumpau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >>> Thanks. The other useful one is to see whether it does 256 colours > >>> properly like real xterm does. The following bash script, when run with > >>> '256' as its argument, should look the same as it does when run under > >>> a real xterm. > >> > >> Not even close here. > > > > Your script produces 256 different colours here, the shades dont match > > xterm's exactly, but there are definitely 256 distinct colours. > > <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/256-colours-match-xterm.html> > > Ahh, apparently it matches an old version, but they plan to update it. > > Tavis. > > -- > ------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | finger me for my gpg key. > ------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
